 |
 |
|
|
01.04.10 Florian Mueller Sets Out To Save MySQL IN 2010  By Savio RodriguesFlorian Mueller begins 2010 by demonstrating why he was named EU Campaigner of the Year by the Economist five years ago. While most of us were prepping for New Year's Eve celebrations or contemplating New Year's resolutions, Monty and Mueller spent December 28th launching an online Save MySQL petition against the Oracle acquisition of MySQL via Sun. Mueller reports via email: "www.helpmysql.org campaign delivers first 14,000 signatures against Oracle's proposed acquisition of MySQL to European, Chinese and Russian competition authorities.
In less than one week, during the Holiday Season, we gathered 50 times more customer support than Oracle claimed three weeks ago." You can read the full press release here. The campaign is displaying stats from petition signees. This post is based on the first 16,306 signees as of 9am EST on Monday, January 4th. If the results change markedly with new signees, I'll post an update. MySQL Enterprise Usage Whether MySQL poses a competitive threat to Oracle's database business has been a point of significant disagreement between Oracle and opponents of the MySQL acquisition including Monty and Mueller. Oracle says there is little to no overlap. Monty argues that MySQL has become feature rich and is a suitable replacement for Oracle's database in several situations. Nearly a quarter of respondents identified themselves as working at a company using MySQL, and not simply an independent or self-employed software or web developer. Of the respondents working at a company using MySQL, just over 20 percent worked at a company with 1000 or more employees. This is clearly a customer group where Oracle databases would compete. These results would seem to support Monty's claims about MySQL competitiveness against Oracle. On the other hand, there's no reason that a large company wouldn't want to use both MySQL and Oracle databases for small and large projects respectively. In such a situation, did the MySQL usage displace Oracle usage, or, as Oracle would argue, SQL Server usage? The former would support Monty's claim, while the latter would support Oracle's claim. A generalized version of this question would have been a helpful addition to the Save MySQL petition. Signees Would Require Oracle to Sell MySQL Of the three solutions that Mueller and Monty suggest Oracle agree to before being allowed to complete the Sun acquisition, over 90 percent of signees believe that MySQL must be divested to a suitable third party. Only 60 percent of signees believe that Oracle should be allowed to acquire MySQL as part of the Sun acquisition. These signees would require Oracle to either commit to a linking exception for applications that use MySQL or require Oracle to release past and future versions of MySQL under the Apache Software License 2.0. Go ahead and take a look at the petition here. Comments About the Author: Savio Rodrigues is a product manager with IBM's WebSphere Software division. He envisions a day when open source and traditional software live in harmony. This site contains Savio's personal views. IBM does not necessarily agree with the views expressed here. |
|
| ||
| --
SQLProNews is an iEntry, Inc. publication -- iEntry, Inc. 2549 Richmond Rd. Lexington KY, 40509 2010 iEntry, Inc. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy Legal advertising info | news headlines | free newsletters | comments/feedback | submit article |
SQLproNews is brought to you by: